MT Desk: Iranian Navy IRIS Dena sailed off from the shores of India after attending a Fleet review hosted by India on Friday.
According to Media personnel, as it was cruising within Indian territorial waters, it was hit by a US submarine. Without the help of India, the US could not have attacked the Iranian Ship.
More than 100 people on board are missing. Indians yet again proved they are not trustworthy; they call people as guests and present them as a token to their enemies.
Even the Indian Navy didn’t conduct S&R operations, rather the Sri Lankan Navy rescued 78 Iranian sailors.
A US Defence analyst in a TV programme said that the US is using Indian ports and also remembered Modi’s visit to Israel and statement that Israel is Fatherland.
The former Indian Navy Chief, who warned that a nuclear submarine was operating in these waters and stated that India must express serious concern over maritime war being brought to its doorstep.
Indian foreign policy is no more nonaligned, it is a party against Iran, and betrayed Iran.
Meanwhile, India is using its financial influence and logistical “assistance” to shape the electoral landscape in favour of parties aligned with Indian interests, particularly the Nepali Congress, widely viewed as pro-India, raising serious questions about the integrity of the democratic process.
According to Kashmir Media Service, while India claims to be supporting Nepal’s Election Commission through vehicles, equipment, training and cross-border coordination, observers say such involvement creates space for political manipulation rather than neutral assistance.
The timing is significant, as the elections follow the 2025 youth-led protests that forced the previous government to resign, leaving Nepal politically fragile and vulnerable to external influence.
Analysts warn that India’s objective appears to be the installation of a compliant leadership in Kathmandu that will align Nepal’s policies with New Delhi’s strategic priorities.
With major parties divided between pro-India and pro-China orientations, the contest has effectively become a geopolitical tug of war.
Critics argue that if money and influence determine the outcome, Nepal’s sovereignty risks being reduced to a bargaining chip in regional power politics.